Inclusion or Exclusion in The Crucible Essay - 2359 Words

Much of The Crucible by Arthur Miller was about being part of a group. What is it to belong to a group? Is it really that simple when someone says, quot;Either youre with us or youre notquot;? Yes, it is that simple. Belonging and exclusion in any situation are two sides of the same coin - you cant have one without the other. In any organization or group, people are bound together by a community of interest, purpose or function and if you do not believe in these same things, then you are not a part of that group. In an organization or group, you have to ask yourself, quot;What is it to be a part of this particular group, what does it take to belong?quot; It takes following the rules of the group, agreeing with their purpose,†¦show more content†¦Traditionally, rules are set out for the members to follow. Generally, explicit rules are made in order for everyone to obviously and without question understand what is expected of them. Ideally, a clear list of what you can and can not do and what is acceptable and unacceptable in their organization should exist. Unfortunately these requirements are not all written down - implicit standards are always hiding in a group, whether they are talked of or not is up to the group. We usually call these implicit rules actual quot;normsquot; which are there to ensure that only the quot;properquot; people are involved in the group. Implicit details often provide secret exclusion for members that dont quot;belongquot;. quot;Some details are implicitly implied only because by exploiting these undercover rules, the image of the group is disturbed and the hypocrisy of the rule makers might be uncovered.(Johnson 37)quot; Without rules people might be able to act as they please which is not the purpose of a group. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Just as in society, with rules must come enforcers. There can be no expectations for people to follow the rules if there is no one to enforce the consequences. This is why authority and leadership are key points in keeping their sense of belonging in a group. It is well known that people tend to lose focus of what is important to them when no one is helping them along, thus the necessity for role expectations. Someone in a groupShow MoreRelatedThe Paradoxical Nature of Belonging Depicted in Arthur Millers The Crucible1318 Words   |  6 PagesIn Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, we are positioned to see belonging as paradoxical, in that the positive, human quality of belonging inevitably carries with it the negative and dangerous corollary of exclusion. By belonging, we are automatically excluding others and excluding ourselves from other groups. The Crucible achieves this complex presentation of belonging through a variety of interconnected techniques wh ich will be explored in this essay. These techniques may be categorized into four mainRead MoreThe Crucible Essay1784 Words   |  8 Pages------------------------------------------------- THE CRUCIBLE ESSAY ‘The Crucible’ written by Arthur Miller and my related material ‘Happy Feet’ by George Miller is true to this statement â€Å"Understanding nourishes belonging†¦a lack of understanding prevents it† that represents the interpretation of belonging. To define belong is to have the correct personal and social assets to be a member of a particular group or it could be to fit a particular environment. By a sense of place, people youRead More War Creates Social Division, Not Cohesion Essay5403 Words   |  22 Pagesbefore in its history and never again in the immediate future, would America enjoy such unity in time of war (Gerstle, 189). It seemed Americans were ready and willing to fight for their country. John Whiteclay Chambers II, in Gerstles book American Crucible, offers evidence-displaying Americans willingness to engage in war. He explains the Second World Wars refusal of induction to the draft and desertion rates from basic training were far below those for World War I or Vietnam. Only one-half of oneRead MoreSuccess and Failure in Organizational Change14750 Words   |  59 Pageswants. Success brings isolation and resentment from the ‘have-nots’ and feelings of loneliness and exclusion lead to emergence of . . . Collective: Deny self for equality, sharing and humanity, wealth distribution, charity and working for humanitarian causes to aid social developmen t and community. All are equal in the eyes of society, no one person is in control, consensus decision-making, inclusion and harmony eventually leads to lower efï ¬ ciencies. Lack of effective progress leads to emergence ofRead MoreRastafarian79520 Words   |  319 PagesBabylon. â€Å"Beating Down Babylon†: Ideological Delegitimation Rastafari is ï ¬ rst and foremost a response to the Babylonian conditions of the Jamaican society and, by extension, of the whole Western world. The Rastafarian phenomenon was forged in the crucible of oppression that started in plantation slavery and that has persisted in post-emancipation and postcolonial Jamaica. The manner in which some experienced and perceived the realities of the colonial society called forth the response and shapedRead MoreCrossing the Chasm76808 Words   |  308 Pagesrapidity that allows its initial leaders to become very, very successful. The key in all this is crossing the chasm—making that mainstream market emerge. This is a do-or-die proposition for high-tech enterprises; hence, it is logical that they be the crucible in which â€Å"chasm theory† is formed. But the principles can be generalized to other forms of marketing, so for the general reader who can bear with all the high-tech examples in this book, useful lessons may be learned. One of the most importantRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesbehavior of people at work. In addition, you’ll gain insights into specific people skills that you workforce diversity The concept that organizations are becoming more heterogeneous in terms of gender, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and inclusion of other diverse groups. Source: ITAR - TASS / Anton Tushin / Newscom The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company is recognized worldwide as the gold standard of the hospitality industry. Its motto—â€Å"We are ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen†Ã¢â‚¬â€isRead MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesusually was judged and measured by the depth and capability and hard-asset credentials of the company’s management. That, of course, remains critically important. However, American companies whose performance most readily slipped in the economic crucible at the beginning of the twenty-first century (and whose recovery was among the slowest) seemed to rate highest in hard-asset terms compared with the many companies with a higher mix of soft-asset management strength, whose results were far better

Repentance and Journal Article Review Free Essays

In the second article I chose to read, Hall and Fincham (2005) discuss the concept of self-forgiveness. Their analysis seeks to get to the heart of what it means and essentially what it takes to forgive oneself for wrongdoing and reckless abandon. Enright (1996) defines self-forgiveness as â€Å"a willingness to abandon self-resentment in the face of one’s own acknowledged objective wrong, while fostering compassion, generosity, and love toward oneself. We will write a custom essay sample on Repentance and Journal Article Review or any similar topic only for you Order Now Hall and Fincham (2005) argue that self-forgiveness is an internal and volatile aberration that results in both a retaliatory and benevolent appeal on behalf of the offender. The reason for this is because the offender is in conflict with their ability to do wrong and then compensate with righteous action in rebuttal to their transgression. After the stage of victim identification and reconciliation, avoidance occurs which puts the offender and any sense or notion of wrongdoing they may have had, at peace with themselves (Hall Fincham, 2005).Furthermore, Hall and Fincham (2005) deduce that self-forgiveness does not imply an exemption from heartache, frustration, or regret. The offender will not magically fail to remember or begin to root for such behavior that should lead to another bout with personal disdain and disappointment. In fact, the offender will undergo extensive self-analysis and even consider the implications of interpersonal forgiveness from oneself toward another had they committed a similar offense. Lastly, Hall and Fincham (2005) give attention to the moral aspects of the self-forgiveness concept. According to Horsbrugh (1974) interpersonal forgiveness is bound by biblical scripture which Jesus himself states that â€Å"When you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins† (Mark, 11:25). However, Hall and Fincham (2005) assert that â€Å"self-forgiveness can easily be conditional or impermanent. † A perfect example of the issue about forgiveness would be Michael Vick staring at himself in the mirror after the allegations of masterminding and funding lucrative and horribly tragic dog fighting ring on his personal estate. The interpersonal ability of society to forgive Mick Vick for sponsoring such a deplorable blood sport at the expense of man’s best friend became a national debate that garnered him notoriety unforeseen in sports history. However, if the multitude of saints that denounced Mick Vick had only taken a time-out to reflect on their personal vice, an environment of compa ssion and interpersonal forgiveness could have blossomed, instead of the unforgiving hearts and hypocrisy.On a personal note, I have to consider my own transgressions before I dare judge someone else. Not a single person on this earth possesses the moral immaculateness necessary to judge another human being or the gall to not want to forgive them for wrongdoing. 1 John (1:9-10) states that â€Å"if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives. I know that the issue of self-forgiveness is a bit deeper and personal to the point of self-hatred and belief that no amount of prayer can put you back in God’s good grace. I know this from personal experience and rebuke toward myself for indiscretions that only God almighty knows in complete detail. And with all my grievances and blame placed on God for my trials and tribulations and even minor inconveniences, I have yet to suffer a night without food, shelter, nor clothing.Reflection like this opens your eyes to just how fortunate and blessed all of us sinners are despite our tremendous lack of faith or entitlement. I believe that once a person accepts the necessity of interpersonal forgiveness due to its humbling and sanctif ying power, the key to unlocking the ability to self-forgive will turn up, and open the door to a new outlook on life and unconditional love. Forgiveness is an intangible, deep-rooted, and often faith based conception.Many people seeking interpersonal forgiveness from someone are really seeking closure to the point of getting their mind and personal affairs back in everyday working order. The belief that I can’t sleep at night until I have cleared up a matter between myself and a friend lends credence to the aforementioned statement. The loss of sleep is a result of not having closure from a face to face or heart to heart discourse. However, the concept of self-forgiveness is more about finding personal redemption or liberation from thoughts, feelings, and situations associated with any given transgression (Hall Fincham, 2005).To counsel or console a client or church member in a predicament that involves the forgiveness of a transgression, I would have to be humble and truthful about my own faults and weaknesses. Simply reminding the client about the teachings of Jesus Christ as it relates to forgiveness will not always suffice. I actually strongly believe in mock confrontational platforms in which the transgressor can image and then simulate an encounter with the victim of their wrongdoing.I would play the part of the victim and carry out dual roles of first accepting the offender’s apology and then rehash the encounter with a deliberate refusal to accept the offender’s conciliation. Of course, the acceptance of the offender’s apology in the first scenario will result in instant stress and guilt reduction, but the refusal to accept recompense in the second scenario will reveal the offenders ability to self-forgive and deal with the possibility of delayed or perennial censure. I stated before that the ability to forgive one another grants us humbling and sanctifying powers.Therefore, even after the offender suffers a blow to their constructive self-forgiveness manner, they have not lost the most critical and liberating effect of self-forgiveness because they are at peace with themselves and the higher power in which they confide. Their peace and happiness can live on.References Hall, J. H. , Fincham, F. D. (2005). Self-Forgiveness: The Stepchild of Forgiveness Research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(5), 621-637. Horsbrugh, H. J. (1974). Forgiveness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4(2), 269-282. How to cite Repentance and Journal Article Review, Papers

Descrimination Essay Example For Students

Descrimination Essay discrimination1. The federal government attempted to use many laws to protect the rights of the newlyfreed slaves, such as the Civil rights Act of 1866, which gave African Americans the rightof citizenship and forbade other states from passing their own discriminatory laws. Thisbrought on the Black codes, which restricted much of the African American lives dictatingwhere they were legally allowed to go and designated places they should be in. Thefifteenth amendment was also passed, which states that no one can be kept from votingdespite their race, color or past servitude. It seems to nt wanted to lay down the basicrights for the African Americans of the time, but didnt want to give them to muchfreedom by restricting everything that they did. It seems it was much like probation to me,giving them a little slack to see what they would do with it, but still not really trustingthem. I think the restrictions on African Americans was a good thing however, with all ofthe hatred and discrimination against blacks that was going on at the time. Restrictingwhat they could do and segregating them from the whites was probably the best thing. This separation probably saved many of the newly freed slaves lives, the separation mostlikely reduced the amount of disputes and violent eruptions between the two races ofpeople. In the end, although the laws may have seemed like they failed or brought grief tothe newly freed slaves, I feel the laws saved lives, and yet gave the African Americans anew feeling that they were a part of their country and mattered because they able to vote. I happen to think the laws passed to protect the rights of freed slaves were a success.